HRM20020 Assignment 3 Performance management in context

Assignment 3: Performance management in context

Due date: June 15, 2020 by 11:59 pm AEST

Length: 2000 ± 10% words (excluding cover page, table of contents, executive summary and reference list)

Assessment weighting: 40%

Assessment: Individual

Assessment type: Critical Literature review

Related ULOs: 1,2,3

Assessment Task

Using your critical review and analyses of literature on performance management, attempt to answer the following question:

What would be the key differences in the performance management system designed for companies following the following competitive strategies:

• Innovative
• Quality focused
• Cost focused

Discussion must be carried out around at least two of the various performance management related issues such as design of performance appraisals, reward structure, training and development, and feedback. To complete this assignment to a high standard you need to research the peer-reviewed literature extensively (at least 6-8 papers) in addition to review topics covered in class. Please note that it is imperative that you substantiate your claims, which necessitates the extensive use of peer-reviewed literature to support your argument. You will need to read more broadly than the Readings suggested in the Unit Guide if you wish to get the most out of this assignment. Your argument and conclusions need to emphasise the critical elements of performance management systems in various business environments.

Additional instructions

The assignment would follow the following format:

• An executive summary that succinctly presents the main argument, conclusions and recommendations
• An index or table of contents complete with page numbering
• An introduction that covers the issues relevant to the question that you will be considering in the report and the scope of your inquiry.
• The report body including identification and rigorous analysis of the issues you have identified
• A conclusion that reflects your overall assessment of the issue, the various approaches to the issue and any recommendations for change if appropriate.
• A reference list.

Submission requirements

• Assignments must be submitted via Canvas unit site through the ‘Assignments’ facility.
• Do not email the assessment to either the convenor or instructor.
• Keep a back-up of your submission. If your assignment goes astray, whether your fault or ours, you will be required to reproduce it.
• The assignment should be in one Microsoft Word compatible document and should be written in 12-point font size (e.g., Times New Roman, Garamond) and should use double spacing between each line.
• Pages of the assignment should have footers which include your name, student ID, unit code, assignment title and page numbers.
• It is expected that all work submitted has been edited for spelling, grammar and clarity.
• The standard procedure is that assignments will be marked up to the specified word count only.
• The word count does not include the table of contents, title page, reference list or appendices.
• Any appendices are only to contain supplementary/supporting material. They are not to contain material that is essential to achieving the assignment criteria.

Marking criteria

A rubric, provided at the end of this document, will be used to assess your work.

Referencing

You must use the Swinburne Harvard referencing style throughout your assignment and include a reference list, not a biography, at the end of the assessment.

Extensions and late submission

Please read the section on extensions and late submission in the Unit Outline.

Plagiarism

Please read the section on plagiarism in the Unit Outline.

Assignment help

If you have any queries or concerns, you may discuss them with the convenor and/or instructor in the Canvas discussion board in the appropriate discussion forum or by email.

• Technical help

Technical assistance can be obtained from the Swinburne Service Desk: servicedesk@swin.edu.au or (03) 9214 5000.

Declaration and Statement of Authorship

All students must agree to the following declaration when submitting assessment items

1. I/we have not impersonated, or allowed myself/ourselves to be impersonated by any person for the purposes of this assessment.
2. This assessment is my/our original work and no part of it has been copied from any other source except where due acknowledgement is made.
3. No part of this assessment has been written for me/us by any other person except where such collaboration has been authorised by the lecturer/teacher concerned.
4. I/we have not previously submitted this work for a previous attempt of the unit, another unit or other studies at another institution.
5. I/we give permission for my/our assessment response to be reproduced, communicated, compared and archived for plagiarism detection, benchmarking or educational purposes.

I/we understand that:

• Plagiarism is the presentation of the work, idea or creation of another person as though it is your own. It is a form of cheating and is a very serious academic offence that may lead to exclusion from the University.
• Plagiarised material may be drawn from published and unpublished written documents, interpretations, computer software, designs, music, sounds, images, photographs, and ideas or ideological frameworks gained through working with another person or in a group.
• Plagiarised material can be drawn from, and presented in, written, graphic and visual form, including electronic data and oral presentations. Plagiarism occurs when the origin of the material used is not appropriately cited.

I/we agree and acknowledge that:

1. I/we have read and understood the Declaration and Statement of Authorship above.
2. I/we accept that use of my Swinburne account to electronically submit this assessment constitutes my agreement to the Declaration and Statement of Authorship.
3. If I/we do not agree to the Declaration and Statement of Authorship in this context, the assessment outcome may not be valid for assessment purposes and may not be included in my/our aggregate score for this unit.

Penalties for plagiarism range from a formal caution to expulsion from the university, and are detailed in the Student Academic Misconduct Regulations 2012.