Call Now: (+61) 416-195-006
Q7. “Article 3(4) of the BIT does have the effect for which BIVAC argues, namely that it gives the Tribunal jurisdiction over a claim that arises from or is produced directly in relation to the Contract. This is not, however, the end of the matter.”
- Bureau Veritas, Inspection, Valuation, Assessment and Control, BIVAC B.V. v Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/9, Decision on Jurisdiction of 29 May 2009), para. 142).
Critically discuss the case law of arbitral tribunals on the interpretation and application of the “umbrella clause”. How should tribunals deal with claims made under the “umbrella clause” when those claims have not been presented under the other applicable instrument (e.g., a contract)?
Expert's Answer
You may also like
- Q4. “[T]he Tribunal concludes that the commencement of treaty-based investor-State arbitration constitutes an abuse…..
- Week 6 Discussion Post – Australian Video Games – 350 words. Identify and play a video game produced by an Australian independent studio….
- Assignment Help on Econometric Analysis of Fisher Effect
- 1. Select one of the below topics according to your interest, knowledge, background, and experience:
Domino effect risk analysis… - Assignment Help on Effect of Moist Air on Naturally Aspirated Single Cylinder Diesel Engine Performance
- Q10: What is the effect or link between an organisation’s social, business or ethical standard and the development of customer relationships?
Chat with our Experts
Want to contact us directly? No Problem. We are always here for you
